Peter Lawton
06-16-2005, 11:13 PM
In <bd4dcl$lvk@acadia.ee.vill.edu> Nick Pine wrote:
> Tim Keating <NotForJunkEmail@directinternet11.com1> wrote:
>
>>A device which outputs 17.1 BTU's for every watt hour of input would
>>have a COP of ~5
>>
>> BTU/ (Wh*3.412) == COP.
>
> Right...
>
> Nick
The formula is right, but the description is a little off, I think.
Nick, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the COP is based on the heat
moved (numerator), not counting energy in (work req'd to make system run,
denominator).
I.e., I don't think the numerator is the sum of the heat removed from
the cold side and the work of compression (and motor efficiency factor
in...).
OT: Usually I just lurk here, but since I'm posting, ... Thanks, Nick,
for all your diligent comments when folks mis-use units and terminology.
I am seriously interested in the field of energy, and I realize how
important it is to communicate clearly and correctly, especially when
it's me that's learning.
Peter
(when replying directly, remove the obvious in my posted address)
> Tim Keating <NotForJunkEmail@directinternet11.com1> wrote:
>
>>A device which outputs 17.1 BTU's for every watt hour of input would
>>have a COP of ~5
>>
>> BTU/ (Wh*3.412) == COP.
>
> Right...
>
> Nick
The formula is right, but the description is a little off, I think.
Nick, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the COP is based on the heat
moved (numerator), not counting energy in (work req'd to make system run,
denominator).
I.e., I don't think the numerator is the sum of the heat removed from
the cold side and the work of compression (and motor efficiency factor
in...).
OT: Usually I just lurk here, but since I'm posting, ... Thanks, Nick,
for all your diligent comments when folks mis-use units and terminology.
I am seriously interested in the field of energy, and I realize how
important it is to communicate clearly and correctly, especially when
it's me that's learning.
Peter
(when replying directly, remove the obvious in my posted address)