PDA

View Full Version : AHRC is run by less than 10 people


Plops Mom
06-26-2005, 07:46 AM
AHRC, who claims international recognition and authority on HOA's has
fallen short of it's goal. After a statistcal analysis of the forums
on AHRC.COM, it follows that less than ten people have comprised over
70% of all posts on the forums over the last 36+ months. The
moderators of these forums are mainly people who have posted less than
ten times (one being zero) and people who have joined less than six
months ago.

A request to the owner of AHRC.COM to display DNS numbers of posts
(commoon in most forums) resulted in immediate banning of requester
(me). Apparantly it would reveal the fact that many of these ten
people, and the scant others who visit the site, are duplicates of
others in the clique.

Additionally, their recent article on the 400% increase in traffic was
questioned. Every page refresh, every time you even went back to the
page, it was counted as a "new" visit. Figures don't lie, but liars
certainly can figure. I do not wish AHRC poor statistics, only honest
one's. The refusal to implement accurate visitor counting and DNS
numbers (which have no threat to identity) implies some dishonesty on
their behalf.

When the enemy is a board of five who censor and scrutinize, I began
to realize (and statistically prove) that AHRC's forums have become
the very board that I hate. Not only are they censoring, but as well
they edit YOUR comments without notation, remove posts if it suits
their cause, all identical to my current association board. Who needs
that?

Yes, Elizabeth McMahon, owner of AHRC has refused to remove my posts,
listing my name over and over. If you post on their forums, be aware
they will not be deleted unless they dislike your message. Otherwise,
they's a keeper folks!

Elizabeth was kind enough to remove my name and my account when I got
desperate and changed my avatar to something she simply couldn't
ignore ;) . Still all my posts remain to this day, my name, my data,
etc. I have heard from the lawyers from her ISP and upstream service
providers and I am ready to act... and I am considering it. Violation
of copyright law is quite serious. With one affidavit I can do it.

I must again make an open request - please remove the information. I
do not wish to remove the little bitty "clique of five" site you have
going out there. I wish to be UNASSOCIATED with it. How I achieve
that is up to AHRC. We can go the easy way or the hard way.

Cheers

Plops Mom
06-26-2005, 07:48 AM
Oh my GOD - I saw the perfect reply to this today -

I can always lose weight, but stupidity, arrogance and ugly are for
life.

By the sheer volume of your posts, the tone of them, and your many web
site mentions, failed litigation, and other things (like the place you
live in is a total dump) well - hell Stan, that's a fine howdy doo.
You too can kiss my ass because unlike you, I have a moving van
scheduled to arrive here in the next week. Enjoy your association
litigation and flame wars pal.

You sir are a loser. You have amounted to less than a hill of beans
for all you have done with your life. The email I shared with your
board is a riot - they all know what a head case you are.

KILL FILED THIS DUDE!


"Subcomandante" <subcomandante@dslextreme.com> wrote in message news:<alK4b.173$Mo2.28362978@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>...
> As always you have a shit substituting for your gray matter.
> If I would be Liz I would flush your writings into the toilet where they belong
> you menopausal fucking fat bitch.
>
> -Sub.
>
>
>
>
> "Plops Mom" <plopsmom@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:44056b44.0308282038.2dcce57a@posting.google.c om...
> > AHRC, who claims international recognition and authority on HOA's has
> > fallen short of it's goal. After a statistcal analysis of the forums
> > on AHRC.COM, it follows that less than ten people have comprised over
> > 70% of all posts on the forums over the last 36+ months. The
> > moderators of these forums are mainly people who have posted less than
> > ten times (one being zero) and people who have joined less than six
> > months ago.
> >
> > A request to the owner of AHRC.COM to display DNS numbers of posts
> > (commoon in most forums) resulted in immediate banning of requester
> > (me). Apparantly it would reveal the fact that many of these ten
> > people, and the scant others who visit the site, are duplicates of
> > others in the clique.
> >
> > Additionally, their recent article on the 400% increase in traffic was
> > questioned. Every page refresh, every time you even went back to the
> > page, it was counted as a "new" visit. Figures don't lie, but liars
> > certainly can figure. I do not wish AHRC poor statistics, only honest
> > one's. The refusal to implement accurate visitor counting and DNS
> > numbers (which have no threat to identity) implies some dishonesty on
> > their behalf.
> >
> > When the enemy is a board of five who censor and scrutinize, I began
> > to realize (and statistically prove) that AHRC's forums have become
> > the very board that I hate. Not only are they censoring, but as well
> > they edit YOUR comments without notation, remove posts if it suits
> > their cause, all identical to my current association board. Who needs
> > that?
> >
> > Yes, Elizabeth McMahon, owner of AHRC has refused to remove my posts,
> > listing my name over and over. If you post on their forums, be aware
> > they will not be deleted unless they dislike your message. Otherwise,
> > they's a keeper folks!
> >
> > Elizabeth was kind enough to remove my name and my account when I got
> > desperate and changed my avatar to something she simply couldn't
> > ignore ;) . Still all my posts remain to this day, my name, my data,
> > etc. I have heard from the lawyers from her ISP and upstream service
> > providers and I am ready to act... and I am considering it. Violation
> > of copyright law is quite serious. With one affidavit I can do it.
> >
> > I must again make an open request - please remove the information. I
> > do not wish to remove the little bitty "clique of five" site you have
> > going out there. I wish to be UNASSOCIATED with it. How I achieve
> > that is up to AHRC. We can go the easy way or the hard way.
> >
> > Cheers

Subcomandante
06-26-2005, 07:48 AM
"Plops Mom" <plopsmom@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:44056b44.0309131608.5799fed3@posting.google.c om...
> Oh my GOD - I saw the perfect reply to this today -
>
> I can always lose weight, but stupidity, arrogance and ugly are for
> life.
>
> By the sheer volume of your posts, the tone of them, and your many web
> site mentions, failed litigation, and other things (like the place you
> live in is a total dump) well - hell Stan, that's a fine howdy doo.
> You too can kiss my ass because unlike you, I have a moving van
> scheduled to arrive here in the next week. Enjoy your association
> litigation and flame wars pal.
>
> You sir are a loser. You have amounted to less than a hill of beans
> for all you have done with your life. The email I shared with your
> board is a riot - they all know what a head case you are.
>
> KILL FILED THIS DUDE!
>
Not only that you are fat hairy fucking bitch needlessly attacking Liz, but you
are also showing early stage of acute clitoral psychosexuality by Munchausen
syndrome.
-Sub





>
> "Subcomandante" <subcomandante@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
news:<alK4b.173$Mo2.28362978@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>...
> > As always you have a shit substituting for your gray matter.
> > If I would be Liz I would flush your writings into the toilet where they
belong
> > you menopausal fucking fat bitch.
> >
> > -Sub.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Plops Mom" <plopsmom@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:44056b44.0308282038.2dcce57a@posting.google.c om...
> > > AHRC, who claims international recognition and authority on HOA's has
> > > fallen short of it's goal. After a statistcal analysis of the forums
> > > on AHRC.COM, it follows that less than ten people have comprised over
> > > 70% of all posts on the forums over the last 36+ months. The
> > > moderators of these forums are mainly people who have posted less than
> > > ten times (one being zero) and people who have joined less than six
> > > months ago.
> > >
> > > A request to the owner of AHRC.COM to display DNS numbers of posts
> > > (commoon in most forums) resulted in immediate banning of requester
> > > (me). Apparantly it would reveal the fact that many of these ten
> > > people, and the scant others who visit the site, are duplicates of
> > > others in the clique.
> > >
> > > Additionally, their recent article on the 400% increase in traffic was
> > > questioned. Every page refresh, every time you even went back to the
> > > page, it was counted as a "new" visit. Figures don't lie, but liars
> > > certainly can figure. I do not wish AHRC poor statistics, only honest
> > > one's. The refusal to implement accurate visitor counting and DNS
> > > numbers (which have no threat to identity) implies some dishonesty on
> > > their behalf.
> > >
> > > When the enemy is a board of five who censor and scrutinize, I began
> > > to realize (and statistically prove) that AHRC's forums have become
> > > the very board that I hate. Not only are they censoring, but as well
> > > they edit YOUR comments without notation, remove posts if it suits
> > > their cause, all identical to my current association board. Who needs
> > > that?
> > >
> > > Yes, Elizabeth McMahon, owner of AHRC has refused to remove my posts,
> > > listing my name over and over. If you post on their forums, be aware
> > > they will not be deleted unless they dislike your message. Otherwise,
> > > they's a keeper folks!
> > >
> > > Elizabeth was kind enough to remove my name and my account when I got
> > > desperate and changed my avatar to something she simply couldn't
> > > ignore ;) . Still all my posts remain to this day, my name, my data,
> > > etc. I have heard from the lawyers from her ISP and upstream service
> > > providers and I am ready to act... and I am considering it. Violation
> > > of copyright law is quite serious. With one affidavit I can do it.
> > >
> > > I must again make an open request - please remove the information. I
> > > do not wish to remove the little bitty "clique of five" site you have
> > > going out there. I wish to be UNASSOCIATED with it. How I achieve
> > > that is up to AHRC. We can go the easy way or the hard way.
> > >
> > > Cheers

Christine Geyer
06-26-2005, 07:49 AM
Dear Vivian & other normal people:

We do not respond to the Sub's outlandish e mails, as we all hope he will
someday return to his cave.

Christine

"Subcomandante" <subcomandante@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
news:szR8b.1994$PV4.1907@newssvr29.news.prodigy.co m...
>
> "Plops Mom" <plopsmom@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:44056b44.0309131608.5799fed3@posting.google.c om...
> > Oh my GOD - I saw the perfect reply to this today -
> >
> > I can always lose weight, but stupidity, arrogance and ugly are for
> > life.
> >
> > By the sheer volume of your posts, the tone of them, and your many web
> > site mentions, failed litigation, and other things (like the place you
> > live in is a total dump) well - hell Stan, that's a fine howdy doo.
> > You too can kiss my ass because unlike you, I have a moving van
> > scheduled to arrive here in the next week. Enjoy your association
> > litigation and flame wars pal.
> >
> > You sir are a loser. You have amounted to less than a hill of beans
> > for all you have done with your life. The email I shared with your
> > board is a riot - they all know what a head case you are.
> >
> > KILL FILED THIS DUDE!
> >
> Not only that you are fat hairy fucking bitch needlessly attacking Liz,
but you
> are also showing early stage of acute clitoral psychosexuality by
Munchausen
> syndrome.
> -Sub
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > "Subcomandante" <subcomandante@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
> news:<alK4b.173$Mo2.28362978@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>...
> > > As always you have a shit substituting for your gray matter.
> > > If I would be Liz I would flush your writings into the toilet where
they
> belong
> > > you menopausal fucking fat bitch.
> > >
> > > -Sub.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Plops Mom" <plopsmom@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:44056b44.0308282038.2dcce57a@posting.google.c om...
> > > > AHRC, who claims international recognition and authority on HOA's
has
> > > > fallen short of it's goal. After a statistcal analysis of the
forums
> > > > on AHRC.COM, it follows that less than ten people have comprised
over
> > > > 70% of all posts on the forums over the last 36+ months. The
> > > > moderators of these forums are mainly people who have posted less
than
> > > > ten times (one being zero) and people who have joined less than six
> > > > months ago.
> > > >
> > > > A request to the owner of AHRC.COM to display DNS numbers of posts
> > > > (commoon in most forums) resulted in immediate banning of requester
> > > > (me). Apparantly it would reveal the fact that many of these ten
> > > > people, and the scant others who visit the site, are duplicates of
> > > > others in the clique.
> > > >
> > > > Additionally, their recent article on the 400% increase in traffic
was
> > > > questioned. Every page refresh, every time you even went back to
the
> > > > page, it was counted as a "new" visit. Figures don't lie, but liars
> > > > certainly can figure. I do not wish AHRC poor statistics, only
honest
> > > > one's. The refusal to implement accurate visitor counting and DNS
> > > > numbers (which have no threat to identity) implies some dishonesty
on
> > > > their behalf.
> > > >
> > > > When the enemy is a board of five who censor and scrutinize, I began
> > > > to realize (and statistically prove) that AHRC's forums have become
> > > > the very board that I hate. Not only are they censoring, but as
well
> > > > they edit YOUR comments without notation, remove posts if it suits
> > > > their cause, all identical to my current association board. Who
needs
> > > > that?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, Elizabeth McMahon, owner of AHRC has refused to remove my
posts,
> > > > listing my name over and over. If you post on their forums, be
aware
> > > > they will not be deleted unless they dislike your message.
Otherwise,
> > > > they's a keeper folks!
> > > >
> > > > Elizabeth was kind enough to remove my name and my account when I
got
> > > > desperate and changed my avatar to something she simply couldn't
> > > > ignore ;) . Still all my posts remain to this day, my name, my
data,
> > > > etc. I have heard from the lawyers from her ISP and upstream
service
> > > > providers and I am ready to act... and I am considering it.
Violation
> > > > of copyright law is quite serious. With one affidavit I can do it.
> > > >
> > > > I must again make an open request - please remove the information.
I
> > > > do not wish to remove the little bitty "clique of five" site you
have
> > > > going out there. I wish to be UNASSOCIATED with it. How I achieve
> > > > that is up to AHRC. We can go the easy way or the hard way.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
>

Subcomandante
06-26-2005, 07:49 AM
No menopausal fatso has right to attack Liz fro the AHRC who done more good for
the homeowners than this entire forum aver can.
-Sub




"Christine Geyer" <cm.geyer@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:%_p9b.16163$NX3.1390@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> Dear Vivian & other normal people:
>
> We do not respond to the Sub's outlandish e mails, as we all hope he will
> someday return to his cave.
>
> Christine
>
> "Subcomandante" <subcomandante@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
> news:szR8b.1994$PV4.1907@newssvr29.news.prodigy.co m...
> >
> > "Plops Mom" <plopsmom@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:44056b44.0309131608.5799fed3@posting.google.c om...
> > > Oh my GOD - I saw the perfect reply to this today -
> > >
> > > I can always lose weight, but stupidity, arrogance and ugly are for
> > > life.
> > >
> > > By the sheer volume of your posts, the tone of them, and your many web
> > > site mentions, failed litigation, and other things (like the place you
> > > live in is a total dump) well - hell Stan, that's a fine howdy doo.
> > > You too can kiss my ass because unlike you, I have a moving van
> > > scheduled to arrive here in the next week. Enjoy your association
> > > litigation and flame wars pal.
> > >
> > > You sir are a loser. You have amounted to less than a hill of beans
> > > for all you have done with your life. The email I shared with your
> > > board is a riot - they all know what a head case you are.
> > >
> > > KILL FILED THIS DUDE!
> > >
> > Not only that you are fat hairy fucking bitch needlessly attacking Liz,
> but you
> > are also showing early stage of acute clitoral psychosexuality by
> Munchausen
> > syndrome.
> > -Sub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > "Subcomandante" <subcomandante@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
> > news:<alK4b.173$Mo2.28362978@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>...
> > > > As always you have a shit substituting for your gray matter.
> > > > If I would be Liz I would flush your writings into the toilet where
> they
> > belong
> > > > you menopausal fucking fat bitch.
> > > >
> > > > -Sub.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Plops Mom" <plopsmom@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:44056b44.0308282038.2dcce57a@posting.google.c om...
> > > > > AHRC, who claims international recognition and authority on HOA's
> has
> > > > > fallen short of it's goal. After a statistcal analysis of the
> forums
> > > > > on AHRC.COM, it follows that less than ten people have comprised
> over
> > > > > 70% of all posts on the forums over the last 36+ months. The
> > > > > moderators of these forums are mainly people who have posted less
> than
> > > > > ten times (one being zero) and people who have joined less than six
> > > > > months ago.
> > > > >
> > > > > A request to the owner of AHRC.COM to display DNS numbers of posts
> > > > > (commoon in most forums) resulted in immediate banning of requester
> > > > > (me). Apparantly it would reveal the fact that many of these ten
> > > > > people, and the scant others who visit the site, are duplicates of
> > > > > others in the clique.
> > > > >
> > > > > Additionally, their recent article on the 400% increase in traffic
> was
> > > > > questioned. Every page refresh, every time you even went back to
> the
> > > > > page, it was counted as a "new" visit. Figures don't lie, but liars
> > > > > certainly can figure. I do not wish AHRC poor statistics, only
> honest
> > > > > one's. The refusal to implement accurate visitor counting and DNS
> > > > > numbers (which have no threat to identity) implies some dishonesty
> on
> > > > > their behalf.
> > > > >
> > > > > When the enemy is a board of five who censor and scrutinize, I began
> > > > > to realize (and statistically prove) that AHRC's forums have become
> > > > > the very board that I hate. Not only are they censoring, but as
> well
> > > > > they edit YOUR comments without notation, remove posts if it suits
> > > > > their cause, all identical to my current association board. Who
> needs
> > > > > that?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, Elizabeth McMahon, owner of AHRC has refused to remove my
> posts,
> > > > > listing my name over and over. If you post on their forums, be
> aware
> > > > > they will not be deleted unless they dislike your message.
> Otherwise,
> > > > > they's a keeper folks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Elizabeth was kind enough to remove my name and my account when I
> got
> > > > > desperate and changed my avatar to something she simply couldn't
> > > > > ignore ;) . Still all my posts remain to this day, my name, my
> data,
> > > > > etc. I have heard from the lawyers from her ISP and upstream
> service
> > > > > providers and I am ready to act... and I am considering it.
> Violation
> > > > > of copyright law is quite serious. With one affidavit I can do it.
> > > > >
> > > > > I must again make an open request - please remove the information.
> I
> > > > > do not wish to remove the little bitty "clique of five" site you
> have
> > > > > going out there. I wish to be UNASSOCIATED with it. How I achieve
> > > > > that is up to AHRC. We can go the easy way or the hard way.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> >
>
>