PDA

View Full Version : 1-800-DRYCARPET rebuttal to olc-ca@cox.net - 2002-09-02


Pages : [1] 2

Greg
06-08-2005, 07:55 PM
Several months ago olc-ca@cox.net posted this message;
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=drycarpet&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&newwindow=1&selm=h9h8nukesu4avar8131jdmajqlca8v92be%404ax.com&rnum=1

1-800-DRYCARPET would like to go on record by posting the following
rebuttal to a 2002-09-02 post by Google Groups user olc-ca@cox.net:

1. olc-ca@cox.net (an email address of an alleged DRYCARPET customer)
is not in our company data base. Since October 18, 2001 the company
has required that its customers have a valid email address.
@home.com,net,org also are not in our data base. olc-ca@cox.net posted
his comments on August 9, 2002, (2002-09-02).
1-800-DRYCARPET/America's Preferred has been in businesses since March
1, 1992.

2. We have no knowledge of ever damaging or fraying a customers
(Berber) carpet fiber, ever.

3. Our product (Swedry Carpet Cleaner) is not "simply a product that
can be purchased and/or rented at store" nor is it a duplicate of any
product. 1-800-DRYCARPET, a division of America's Preferred, Inc.,
owns the manufacturing specification rights/formula and is the US
trademark owner of SWEDRY Carpet Cleaner. 1-800-DRYCARPET is 1 of 4 in
the world that manufactures a dry organic carpet cleaning powder. REF:
http://www.1800drycarpet.com/chemist.htm - REF:
http://www.swedry.com/news.htm.

4. The company currently employs 16 - 1-800-DRYCARPET does indeed have
company units and does not only rely upon its Agents. We do indeed
have a network of Authorized Agents (not dealers) who own their own
businesses and are not employees of the company. Our program is
similar to a franchise system, a format that has revolutionized US
business by offering valuable standardization to consumers since the
1950's. The company's Authorized Agents are individual business
owners. REF: http://www.1800drycarpet.com/affiliate_rep_contact.htm -
REF: http://www.drycarpet.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi - REF:
http://www.1800drycarpet.com/mediaramp/.

5. 1-800-DRYCARPET does indeed recommend stain resistant reapplication
ONLY to those customers that have had these materials flushed-out by
hot water extraction methods, (commonly referred to as
steam-cleaning).

6. We noted that the author at the end of his post stated that; "The
next time he ( I ) will do it myself".

This post will be archived by Google Groups under the keyword and US
trademark: "DRYCARPET". 1-800-DRYCARPET is interested in protecting
its good name and offering an alternative to wet shampoo carpet
cleaning methods.

Sincerely,

Greg Cantrell
President/CEO
America's Preferred, Inc.
1-800-DRYCARPET(™)

Sweep
06-08-2005, 07:55 PM
"Greg" <gregc@drycarpet.com> wrote in message
news:cd0f4a3f.0311280113.7915ed04@posting.google.c om...
> Several months ago olc-ca@cox.net posted this message;
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=drycarpet&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&neww
indow=1&selm=h9h8nukesu4avar8131jdmajqlca8v92be%404ax.com&rnum=1
>
> 1-800-DRYCARPET would like to go on record by posting the following
> rebuttal to a 2002-09-02 post by Google Groups user olc-ca@cox.net:
>
> 1. olc-ca@cox.net (an email address of an alleged DRYCARPET customer)
> is not in our company data base. Since October 18, 2001 the company
> has required that its customers have a valid email address.

Are you saying that if someone doesn't have an e mail address you won't do
their carpets?
Was Dave Cortino using a genuine e mail address?

Stoney
06-08-2005, 07:55 PM
gregc@drycarpet.com (Greg) wrote in message news:<cd0f4a3f.0311280113.7915ed04@posting.google.com>...
<snipped>
> Greg Cantrell
> President/CEO
> America's Preferred, Inc.
> 1-800-DRYCARPET(?)
Have you thought about becoming a corporate sponsor?

Greg
06-08-2005, 07:55 PM
suff_ering@yahoo.com.au (Stoney) wrote in message news:<5cba7037.0311281109.4e73c774@posting.google.com>...
> gregc@drycarpet.com (Greg) wrote in message news:<cd0f4a3f.0311280113.7915ed04@posting.google.com>...
> <snipped>
> > Greg Cantrell
> > President/CEO
> > America's Preferred, Inc.
> > 1-800-DRYCARPET(?)
> Have you thought about becoming a corporate sponsor?

I'm new to Google Groups - I'd be interested in learning more, Yes! Thanks Stoney.

Stoney
06-08-2005, 07:55 PM
Sweep wrote:

"Greg" <gregc@drycarpet.com> wrote in message

>> 1. olc-ca@cox.net (an email address of an alleged DRYCARPET
customer)
>> is not in our company data base. Since October 18, 2001 the company
>> has required that its customers have a valid email address.

>Are you saying that if someone doesn't have an e mail address you won't
>do their carpets?
>Was Dave Cortino using a genuine e mail address?

Who?

Marcia Pease
06-08-2005, 07:55 PM
In article <cd0f4a3f.0311281658.6cb7fa58@posting.google.com>,
gregc@drycarpet.com (Greg) wrote:

> suff_ering@yahoo.com.au (Stoney) wrote in message
> news:<5cba7037.0311281109.4e73c774@posting.google.com>...
> > gregc@drycarpet.com (Greg) wrote in message
> > news:<cd0f4a3f.0311280113.7915ed04@posting.google.com>...
> > <snipped>
> > > Greg Cantrell
> > > President/CEO
> > > America's Preferred, Inc.
> > > 1-800-DRYCARPET(?)
> > Have you thought about becoming a corporate sponsor?
>
> I'm new to Google Groups - I'd be interested in learning more, Yes! Thanks
> Stoney.

We have taken legal action to force Google to turn over the IPs of
lurkers. It's unfair to struggling experts like Stoney that he receives
no royalties when lurkers download his articles.

The Sponsorship Advisory Committee has discussed your motto: "Up to now,
we've defined our own terms, and if we're branching out it's because we
need to." Our contributors from the United Kingdom also define their
own terms, which causes confusion for those of us who speak proper
English.
--
Until next time,
Marcey

Sweep
06-08-2005, 07:55 PM
"Marcia Pease" <mbear@nospam.address> wrote in message
news:mbear-44E643.10461730112003@corp-radius.supernews.com...
> In article <cd0f4a3f.0311281658.6cb7fa58@posting.google.com>,
> gregc@drycarpet.com (Greg) wrote:
>
> > suff_ering@yahoo.com.au (Stoney) wrote in message
> > news:<5cba7037.0311281109.4e73c774@posting.google.com>...
> > > gregc@drycarpet.com (Greg) wrote in message
> > > news:<cd0f4a3f.0311280113.7915ed04@posting.google.com>...
> > > <snipped>
> > > > Greg Cantrell
> > > > President/CEO
> > > > America's Preferred, Inc.
> > > > 1-800-DRYCARPET(?)
> > > Have you thought about becoming a corporate sponsor?
> >
> > I'm new to Google Groups - I'd be interested in learning more, Yes!
Thanks
> > Stoney.
>
> We have taken legal action to force Google to turn over the IPs of
> lurkers. It's unfair to struggling experts like Stoney that he receives
> no royalties when lurkers download his articles.
>
> The Sponsorship Advisory Committee has discussed your motto: "Up to now,
> we've defined our own terms, and if we're branching out it's because we
> need to." Our contributors from the United Kingdom also define their
> own terms, which causes confusion for those of us who speak proper
> English.
FH won't like it. he's one of the sponsors and he's the carpet man in here.

Dawn
06-08-2005, 07:55 PM
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:46:18 -0500, Marcia Pease
<mbear@nospam.address> wrote:

>In article <cd0f4a3f.0311281658.6cb7fa58@posting.google.com>,
> gregc@drycarpet.com (Greg) wrote:
>
>> suff_ering@yahoo.com.au (Stoney) wrote in message
>> news:<5cba7037.0311281109.4e73c774@posting.google.com>...
>> > gregc@drycarpet.com (Greg) wrote in message
>> > news:<cd0f4a3f.0311280113.7915ed04@posting.google.com>...
>> > <snipped>
>> > > Greg Cantrell
>> > > President/CEO
>> > > America's Preferred, Inc.
>> > > 1-800-DRYCARPET(?)
>> > Have you thought about becoming a corporate sponsor?
>>
>> I'm new to Google Groups - I'd be interested in learning more, Yes! Thanks
>> Stoney.
>
>We have taken legal action to force Google to turn over the IPs of
>lurkers. It's unfair to struggling experts like Stoney that he receives
>no royalties when lurkers download his articles.
>
>The Sponsorship Advisory Committee has discussed your motto: "Up to now,
>we've defined our own terms, and if we're branching out it's because we
>need to." Our contributors from the United Kingdom also define their
>own terms, which causes confusion for those of us who speak proper
>English.
Were they in Welsh?