Re: What does everyone think of this ad?

[Wayne]

"Val" <vlongpre@rogers.com> wrote in
news:Ksbnc.460065$2oI1.240612@twister01.bloor.is.n et.cable.rogers.com:

> Would you call this company if the ad looked like this? curious... Or
> should it be modified some more.. Thanks in advance for all the
> support Val
>
>
> begin 666 Capture.jpg
>
> Attachment saved: c:\Xnews\attachments\Capture.jpg
> `
> end

I think it's a great and fun looking ad, and very to the point. I'd call
if you lived in Phoenix, AZ!

Wayne

[BonnieJean]

x-no-archive: yes

> "Val" <vlongpre@rogers.com> wrote in
> news:Ksbnc.460065$2oI1.240612@twister01.bloor.is.n et.cable.rogers.com:
>
> > Would you call this company if the ad looked like this? curious... Or
> > should it be modified some more.. Thanks in advance for all the
> > support Val

I like it. Will the colors reproduce as nicely and crisply with newspaper (I
am assuming that's where it'll be)? I would be concerned that it may not be
as legible on newspaper.

[Sweep]

> "Val" <vlongpre@rogers.com> wrote in
> news:Ksbnc.460065$2oI1.240612@twister01.bloor.is.n et.cable.rogers.com:
>
> > Would you call this company if the ad looked like this? curious... Or
> > should it be modified some more.. Thanks in advance for all the
> > support Val
> >
> >
> > begin 666 Capture.jpg
> >
> > Attachment saved: c:\Xnews\attachments\Capture.jpg

abuse@rogers.com
reported!

[Wayne]

sweep@whoever.com (Sweep) wrote in news:bb680f1b.0405090827.59514984
@posting.google.com:

>> "Val" <vlongpre@rogers.com> wrote in
>> news:Ksbnc.460065$2oI1.240612@twister01.bloor.is.n et.cable.rogers.com:
>>
>> > Would you call this company if the ad looked like this? curious... Or
>> > should it be modified some more.. Thanks in advance for all the
>> > support Val
>> >
>> >
>> > begin 666 Capture.jpg
>> >
>> > Attachment saved: c:\Xnews\attachments\Capture.jpg
>
> abuse@rogers.com
> reported!

Asshole!

[Sweep]

Wayne <waynebw@att.net> wrote in message news:<Xns94E46648D113Dwaynebw@204.127.36.1>...
> sweep@whoever.com (Sweep) wrote in news:bb680f1b.0405090827.59514984
> @posting.google.com:
>
> >> "Val" <vlongpre@rogers.com> wrote in
> >> news:Ksbnc.460065$2oI1.240612@twister01.bloor.is.n et.cable.rogers.com:
> >>
> >> > Would you call this company if the ad looked like this? curious... Or
> >> > should it be modified some more.. Thanks in advance for all the
> >> > support Val
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > begin 666 Capture.jpg
> >> >
> >> > Attachment saved: c:\Xnews\attachments\Capture.jpg
> >
> > abuse@rogers.com
> > reported!
>
> Asshole!

no 'R' ?
No attachments here.
It's the rules.

[Wayne]

sweep@whoever.com (Sweep) wrote in
news:bb680f1b.0405100231.606b133d@posting.google.c om:

> Wayne <waynebw@att.net> wrote in message
> news:<Xns94E46648D113Dwaynebw@204.127.36.1>...
>> sweep@whoever.com (Sweep) wrote in news:bb680f1b.0405090827.59514984
>> @posting.google.com:
>>
>> >> "Val" <vlongpre@rogers.com> wrote in
>> >> news:Ksbnc.460065$2oI1.240612@twister01.bloor.is.n et.cable.rogers.c
>> >> om:
>> >>
>> >> > Would you call this company if the ad looked like this?
>> >> > curious... Or should it be modified some more.. Thanks in
>> >> > advance for all the support Val
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > begin 666 Capture.jpg
>> >> >
>> >> > Attachment saved: c:\Xnews\attachments\Capture.jpg
>> >
>> > abuse@rogers.com
>> > reported!
>>
>> Asshole!
>
> no 'R' ?
> No attachments here.
> It's the rules.
>

Like you've never broken a rule before...

You obviously have no life. Get one!

--
Wayne

Big on natural foods?? 82.38% of people die of "natural" causes.

[Barbecue Bob]

In article <Xns94E536165B1E7waynebw@204.127.36.1>,
Wayne <waynebw@att.net> wrote:

> sweep@whoever.com (Sweep) wrote in
> news:bb680f1b.0405100231.606b133d@posting.google.c om:
>
> > Wayne <waynebw@att.net> wrote in message
> > news:<Xns94E46648D113Dwaynebw@204.127.36.1>...
> >>
> >> Asshole!
> >
> > no 'R' ?
> > No attachments here.
> > It's the rules.
> >
>
> Like you've never broken a rule before...

If Sweep had ever broken a rule here, DrClean would have issued an
implicit warning.

I, too, would have reported the spam with the jpg attachment if my
server had not plonked it.
>
> You obviously have no life. Get one!

Sweep's contributions reveal a full and meaningful life. What about
you? Would somebody who had a life come to the usenet's most respected
group to troll with an OT discussion? Your vulgar epithet makes you
sound like a juvenile craving attention. I wonder how many regulars
have alerted Marcey.
--
Barbecue Bob serving family-style roast bunny
at convenient restaurants
from Montana to New Mexico

[jamie]

Barbecue Bob <bunny@nospam.com> wrote:
> I, too, would have reported the spam with the jpg attachment if my
> server had not plonked it.

Ditto.

And I would not do business with any company spamming newsgroups,
regardless of whether the spam is thinly disguised as an off-topic
request for critique on the ad.

Spamming binaries to non-binary groups is an added offense, but a lot
of news servers will just delete misplaced binaries these days.

--
jamie (jamiemck@newsguy.com)

"There's a seeker born every minute."