Vacuum packed - vacuum cleaner design

[mjy]

Vacuum packed - vacuum cleaner design

James Dyson's Dual Cyclone vacuum cleaners
have effectively rendered conventional machines
obsolete. Their internal engineering.....

http://www.wenmarcorp.com/vacuumcleaners/

[BT Newsgroups]

bollocks

a conventional vacuum has about twice the suction when the bag is new, and
only about 10% less when full. don't be fooled.

also, why when I walk into a store do I see bags and belts for every
machine, but spares for dysons cover half of one wall - coz they break.

lets compare to a kirby, which has about 5 times the suction when empty, and
about twice the suction when full. bagless cleaners are crap, you have to
vacuum round about the bin after you empty them, but if you put a new bag
in, that's emptied and filter changed in one go. and no mess.

and the filters for a dyson cost m ore than some bags.

rant over.



"mjy" <mjy222@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OfidncfPi9lFkDbcRVn-qw@centurytel.net...
> Vacuum packed - vacuum cleaner design
>
> James Dyson's Dual Cyclone vacuum cleaners
> have effectively rendered conventional machines
> obsolete. Their internal engineering.....
>
> http://www.wenmarcorp.com/vacuumcleaners/
>

[Vox Humana]

"BT Newsgroups" <webmaster@cleantech.co.uk> wrote in message
news:coi74h$am8$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> bollocks
>
> a conventional vacuum has about twice the suction when the bag is new, and
> only about 10% less when full. don't be fooled.
>
> also, why when I walk into a store do I see bags and belts for every
> machine, but spares for dysons cover half of one wall - coz they break.
>
> lets compare to a kirby, which has about 5 times the suction when empty,
and
> about twice the suction when full. bagless cleaners are crap, you have to
> vacuum round about the bin after you empty them, but if you put a new bag
> in, that's emptied and filter changed in one go. and no mess.
>

When you start to talk the outrageous price that people pay for a Kirby, you
may as well get a whole house, central vacuum.

[Dawn]

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:29:05 +0000 (UTC), "BT Newsgroups"
<webmaster@cleantech.co.uk> wrote:

>bollocks
>
>a conventional vacuum has about twice the suction when the bag is new, and
>only about 10% less when full. don't be fooled.

I find my Dyson has far more suction than any other machine I have
owned. I'm very pleased with it.

>also, why when I walk into a store do I see bags and belts for every
>machine, but spares for dysons cover half of one wall - coz they break.

They all break or get worn out at some time don't they?
Maybe because Dysons are so popular in the UK more spares have to be
available.

>lets compare to a kirby, which has about 5 times the suction when empty, and
>about twice the suction when full. bagless cleaners are crap, you have to
>vacuum round about the bin after you empty them, but if you put a new bag
>in, that's emptied and filter changed in one go. and no mess.

I find it easy to empty the bag with no mess whatsoever.

>and the filters for a dyson cost m ore than some bags.

Mine are the lifelong filters :)


>
>rant over.
>
>
>
>"mjy" <mjy222@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:OfidncfPi9lFkDbcRVn-qw@centurytel.net...
>> Vacuum packed - vacuum cleaner design
>>
>> James Dyson's Dual Cyclone vacuum cleaners
>> have effectively rendered conventional machines
>> obsolete. Their internal engineering.....
>>
>> http://www.wenmarcorp.com/vacuumcleaners/
>>
>