|
|
#1 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I'm looking at buying a tablesaw, and I think I've settled on the
Grizzly 1023SLX: http://www.grizzly.com/products/item...umber=G1023SLX I've gotten a lot of positive reports about the 1023; does anyone who owns one have anything negative to say about it? (Negative reports aren't necessarily a dealbreaker, of course, but it's nice to be forewarned about what could possibly go wrong and how to resolve those problems.) Thanks! Darin |
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message news:e9amc.11205$0K.6187@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > I'm looking at buying a tablesaw, and I think I've settled on the > Grizzly 1023SLX: > > http://www.grizzly.com/products/item...umber=G1023SLX > > I've gotten a lot of positive reports about the 1023; does anyone who > owns one have anything negative to say about it? (Negative reports > aren't necessarily a dealbreaker, of course, but it's nice to be > forewarned about what could possibly go wrong and how to resolve those > problems.) > > Thanks! > Darin I didn't like the power cord so I changed it. The switch could be bigger too, but it is not a problem. So many things COULD go wrong that it is impossible to list. However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to offer anything extra in my view. Jack |
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message news:e9amc.11205$0K.6187@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > I'm looking at buying a tablesaw, and I think I've settled on the > Grizzly 1023SLX: > > http://www.grizzly.com/products/item...umber=G1023SLX > > I've gotten a lot of positive reports about the 1023; does anyone who > owns one have anything negative to say about it? (Negative reports > aren't necessarily a dealbreaker, of course, but it's nice to be > forewarned about what could possibly go wrong and how to resolve those > problems.) > > Thanks! > Darin I didn't like the power cord so I changed it. The switch could be bigger too, but it is not a problem. So many things COULD go wrong that it is impossible to list. However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to offer anything extra in my view. Jack |
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
"Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message news:e9amc.11205$0K.6187@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > I'm looking at buying a tablesaw, and I think I've settled on the > Grizzly 1023SLX: > > http://www.grizzly.com/products/item...umber=G1023SLX > > I've gotten a lot of positive reports about the 1023; does anyone who > owns one have anything negative to say about it? (Negative reports > aren't necessarily a dealbreaker, of course, but it's nice to be > forewarned about what could possibly go wrong and how to resolve those > problems.) > > Thanks! > Darin I didn't like the power cord so I changed it. The switch could be bigger too, but it is not a problem. So many things COULD go wrong that it is impossible to list. However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to offer anything extra in my view. Jack |
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table?
Roger "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message news:c7bbmt$sp2$1@news01.intel.com... > > "Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message > news:e9amc.11205$0K.6187@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > > I'm looking at buying a tablesaw, and I think I've settled on the > > Grizzly 1023SLX: > > > > http://www.grizzly.com/products/item...umber=G1023SLX > > > > I've gotten a lot of positive reports about the 1023; does anyone who > > owns one have anything negative to say about it? (Negative reports > > aren't necessarily a dealbreaker, of course, but it's nice to be > > forewarned about what could possibly go wrong and how to resolve those > > problems.) > > > > Thanks! > > Darin > > I didn't like the power cord so I changed it. The switch could be bigger > too, but it is not a problem. > So many things COULD go wrong that it is impossible to list. > However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to > offer anything extra in my view. > > Jack > > |
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table?
Roger "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message news:c7bbmt$sp2$1@news01.intel.com... > > "Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message > news:e9amc.11205$0K.6187@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > > I'm looking at buying a tablesaw, and I think I've settled on the > > Grizzly 1023SLX: > > > > http://www.grizzly.com/products/item...umber=G1023SLX > > > > I've gotten a lot of positive reports about the 1023; does anyone who > > owns one have anything negative to say about it? (Negative reports > > aren't necessarily a dealbreaker, of course, but it's nice to be > > forewarned about what could possibly go wrong and how to resolve those > > problems.) > > > > Thanks! > > Darin > > I didn't like the power cord so I changed it. The switch could be bigger > too, but it is not a problem. > So many things COULD go wrong that it is impossible to list. > However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to > offer anything extra in my view. > > Jack > > |
|
|
#7 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table?
Roger "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message news:c7bbmt$sp2$1@news01.intel.com... > > "Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message > news:e9amc.11205$0K.6187@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > > I'm looking at buying a tablesaw, and I think I've settled on the > > Grizzly 1023SLX: > > > > http://www.grizzly.com/products/item...umber=G1023SLX > > > > I've gotten a lot of positive reports about the 1023; does anyone who > > owns one have anything negative to say about it? (Negative reports > > aren't necessarily a dealbreaker, of course, but it's nice to be > > forewarned about what could possibly go wrong and how to resolve those > > problems.) > > > > Thanks! > > Darin > > I didn't like the power cord so I changed it. The switch could be bigger > too, but it is not a problem. > So many things COULD go wrong that it is impossible to list. > However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to > offer anything extra in my view. > > Jack > > |
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah -- 7' rails + extension table + legs for $1125 (which is $230 more
than the cost of the SL with the 30" fence, which seems reasonable). I suppose I could always get the 30" fence version, buy a longer fence, (try to) sell the short fence on Ebay, and build my own extension table and legs, but it hardly seems worth it for $230. Darin Roger L wrote: > I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table? > "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message >>However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to >>offer anything extra in my view. |
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah -- 7' rails + extension table + legs for $1125 (which is $230 more
than the cost of the SL with the 30" fence, which seems reasonable). I suppose I could always get the 30" fence version, buy a longer fence, (try to) sell the short fence on Ebay, and build my own extension table and legs, but it hardly seems worth it for $230. Darin Roger L wrote: > I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table? > "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message >>However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to >>offer anything extra in my view. |
|
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Yeah -- 7' rails + extension table + legs for $1125 (which is $230 more
than the cost of the SL with the 30" fence, which seems reasonable). I suppose I could always get the 30" fence version, buy a longer fence, (try to) sell the short fence on Ebay, and build my own extension table and legs, but it hardly seems worth it for $230. Darin Roger L wrote: > I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table? > "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message >>However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to >>offer anything extra in my view. |
|
|
#11 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Darin,
That is what I thought as well. Not a real steal but certainly seems reasonable. Roger "Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message news:Jmbmc.22046$ee7.1705@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > Yeah -- 7' rails + extension table + legs for $1125 (which is $230 more > than the cost of the SL with the 30" fence, which seems reasonable). > > I suppose I could always get the 30" fence version, buy a longer fence, > (try to) sell the short fence on Ebay, and build my own extension table > and legs, but it hardly seems worth it for $230. > > Darin > > Roger L wrote: > > I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table? > > > "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message > >>However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to > >>offer anything extra in my view. |
|
|
#12 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Darin,
That is what I thought as well. Not a real steal but certainly seems reasonable. Roger "Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message news:Jmbmc.22046$ee7.1705@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > Yeah -- 7' rails + extension table + legs for $1125 (which is $230 more > than the cost of the SL with the 30" fence, which seems reasonable). > > I suppose I could always get the 30" fence version, buy a longer fence, > (try to) sell the short fence on Ebay, and build my own extension table > and legs, but it hardly seems worth it for $230. > > Darin > > Roger L wrote: > > I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table? > > > "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message > >>However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to > >>offer anything extra in my view. |
|
|
#13 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Darin,
That is what I thought as well. Not a real steal but certainly seems reasonable. Roger "Darin" <darin-nntp@44clarence.com> wrote in message news:Jmbmc.22046$ee7.1705@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > Yeah -- 7' rails + extension table + legs for $1125 (which is $230 more > than the cost of the SL with the 30" fence, which seems reasonable). > > I suppose I could always get the 30" fence version, buy a longer fence, > (try to) sell the short fence on Ebay, and build my own extension table > and legs, but it hardly seems worth it for $230. > > Darin > > Roger L wrote: > > I thought the "X" added the longer rails and side table? > > > "Jack" <Jack.Dahlgren@intel.com> wrote in message > >>However, so far nothing has gone wrong. Why get the X? It doesn't seem to > >>offer anything extra in my view. |
|
|
#14 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I had the G9957 a few years ago...bump it with the broom and the
magnetic switch would snap on. Not only dangerous, but at those amps, a substantial gulp of juice. |
|
|
#15 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I had the G9957 a few years ago...bump it with the broom and the
magnetic switch would snap on. Not only dangerous, but at those amps, a substantial gulp of juice. |